Perforated Meckel’s diverticulum, a rare but serious complication, presents a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge in adults. Laparoscopic surgery has emerged as a viable approach for managing this condition, offering potential advantages over traditional open techniques. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic management for perforated Meckel’s diverticulum in adults and to analyze outcomes related to surgical techniques and patient recovery. A retrospective review was conducted of adult patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for perforated Meckel’s diverticulum over a specified period. Data collected included patient demographics, clinical presentation, surgical techniques employed, intraoperative findings, postoperative outcomes, and complications. Comparative analysis was performed with historical data on open surgical approaches. Laparoscopic management was successfully implemented in X number of patients, with outcomes indicating a favorable profile in terms of reduced operative time, shorter hospital stay, and lower complication rates compared to open surgery. Key laparoscopic techniques and considerations were identified, including the use of advanced imaging and instrumentation. Postoperative recovery was generally rapid, with minimal complications reported. Laparoscopic surgery for perforated Meckel’s diverticulum in adults offers several benefits, including improved recovery times and reduced postoperative complications. This approach is a safe and effective alternative to open surgery, with outcomes supporting its use as a standard treatment modality. Further studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up are recommended to confirm these findings and optimize surgical strategies.

Laparoscopic surgery, Meckel’s diverticulum, perforation

Anderson DJ. Carcinoid tumor in Meckel’s diverticulum: laparoscopic treatment and review of the literature. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2000; 100 (7):432-434.

Mackey WC, Dineen P. A fifty-year experience with Meckel’s diverticulum. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1983; 156 (1):54 -56.

Soltero MJ, Bill AH. The natural history of Meckel’s diverticulum and its relation to incidental removal. A study of 202 cases of diseased Meckel’s diverticulum found in King County,Washington, over a fifteen year period. Am J Surg. 1976; 132(2):168–173.

Leijonmarck CE, Bonman-Sandelin K, Frisell J, et al. Meckel’s diverticulum in the adult. Br J Surg. 1986; 73(2):146–149.

Yamaguchi M, Takeuchi S, Awazu S. Meckel’s diverticulum investigation of 600 patients in the Japanese literature. Am J Surg. 1978; 136(2):247–249.

Weinstein EC, Cain JC, ReMine WH. Meckel’s diverticulum: 55 years of clinical and surgical experience. JAMA. 1962; 182:251–253.

Lüdtke FE,, Mende V, Kohler H, Lepsien G. Incidence and frequency of complications and management of Meckel’s diverticulum. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1989; 169(6):537–542.

DiGiacomo JC, Cottone FJ. Surgical treatment of Meckel’s diverticulum. South Med J. 1993; 86(6):671-675.

Lu CC, Huang FC, Lee SY. Laparoscopy diagnosis and treatment excision of bleeding Meckel’s diverticulum in a child: report of one case. Acta Paediatr Taiwan. 2003; 44(1):41 - 43.

Cooney DR, Duszynski DO, Camboa E, et al. The abdominal technetium scan (a decade of experience). J Pediatr Surg. 1982; 17(5):611–619.

Schwartz MJ, Lewis JH. Meckel’s diverticulum: pitfalls in scintigraphic detection in the adult. Am J Gastroenterol. 1984; 79(8):611–618.

Shalaby RY, Soliman SM, et al. Laparoscop-ic management of Meckel's diverticulum in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2005; 40(3):562-567.

Hager M, Maier H, Eberwein M, et al. Perforated Meckel's diverticulum presenting as a gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a case report. J Gastrointest Surg. 2005;9(6):809-811.

Zani A, Eaton S, Rees CM, et al. Incidentally detected Meckel diverticulum: to resect or not to resect? Ann Surg. 2008; 247: 276-281.

Sai Prasad TR, Chui CH, Singaporewalla FR, et al. Meckel's diverticular complications in children: is laparoscopy the order of the day? Pediatr Surg Int. 2007; 23(2):141-147.