ASSESSING THE EFFICACY OF WHO STEPS APPROACH IN IDENTIFYING 'AT RISK' INDIVIDUALS FOR DIET-RELATED NON-COMMUNICABLE DISEASES

Ruchika Kandhari

doi:10.37547/ijmsphr/Volume04Issue08-03

Authors

Ruchika Kandhari

Lecturer, Department of Health & Development, M. S. University of Baroda, Vadodara, India

Keywords

WHO STEPS approach non-communicable diseases diet-related

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) has developed the STEPS approach as a comprehensive tool to assess and monitor non-communicable diseases (NCDs) risk factors, including diet-related factors. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of the WHO STEPS approach in identifying "at-risk" individuals for diet-related NCDs in a selected population. The research will employ a cross-sectional design, incorporating data from a diverse sample of participants. The study will utilize standardized questionnaires and measurements to assess dietary patterns, physical activity levels, and other relevant risk factors. The findings from this investigation will provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of the WHO STEPS approach in identifying individuals at risk of diet-related NCDs, contributing to evidence-based public health interventions and strategies to address this global health concern

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1

World Health Organization. Preventing Chronic Diseases. A Vital Investment: WHO Global Report. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2005. Available at: http://www.who.int/chp/chronic_disease_report/en/

2

Leeder et al., A Race against Time: The Challenge of Cardiovascular Disease in Developing Economies (New York: Center for Global Health and Economic Development, Columbia University, April 2004)

3

World Health Organization. WHO global strategy on diet, physical activity and health: South-East Asia regional consultation meeting report, New Delhi, India. 10-12 March 2003. Available at: http://www.who.int/hpr/NPH/docs/regional_consultation_report_searo.pdf

4

Darwin D. Metabolic Syndrome: Time for Action. Journal of American Family Physician Vol. 69/No.12 (June 15, 2004). Available at: http://www.aafp.org/afp/20040615/2875.html Gami AS, Witt BJ, Howard DE, Erwin PJ, Gami LA, Somers VK, Montori VM. A Systematic Review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. J Am Coll Candio 2007; 49: 403-414

5

Wannamethu SG, Shaper AG, Lennon L, Morris RW. Metabolic syndrome vs Framingham risk score for prediction of coronary heart disease, stroke and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Arch Intern Med 2005; 165: 2644-2650

6

Johnson LW, Weinstock RS. The metabolic syndrome: concepts and controversy. Mayo Clin Proc 2006;81:1615-1620.

7

American Heart Association. Summary of American Heart Association Diet and Lifestyle Recommendations Atherosclerosis, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology 2006; 26: 2186

8

Bonita R. Surveillance of risk factors for the NCD’s: The WHO STEPS approach, WHO, 2001.

9

Bonita R. WHO’s response: An integrated approach to NCD Surveillance and prevention consultation on Stepwise Approach to Surveillance of NCD Risk Factors STEPS, STERO, WHO, 2002.