RESULTS OF AESTHETIC ANALYSIS AND INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDIES IN PATIENTS AFTER COMPLETE DENTAL RESTORATION

Sh.A. Boymuradov; D.G. Kuranbayeva

Authors

Sh.A. Boymuradov

Tashkent Medical Academy, Uzbekistan
D.G. Kuranbayeva

Tashkent Medical Academy, Uzbekistan

Keywords

Oral cavity dentofacial anomalies adentia.

Abstract

It has been proven that the close interaction of dental rows plays a significant role in the unity of the dentofacial system in terms of morphology and function. Their integrity is a necessary condition for the physiological functioning of the oral cavity. In the presence of dentofacial anomalies, chewing function, speech, and aesthetics are disrupted. The absence of even one tooth negatively affects not only the function of the dentofacial apparatus, the psychological state of the person, but also the entire organism as a whole. As a result of the loss of teeth, the process of chewing food is disrupted, which negatively affects digestion. The absence of teeth negatively affects the patient's articulation and communication capabilities, which cannot but affect their psycho-emotional status. Long-term presence of dental defects contributes to the distal displacement of the CNS, resulting in abnormalities in the anatomy and function of the CNS, as well as the activity of the maxillofacial nerve apparatus. Total adentia leads to significant changes in the facial skeleton.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1

Bayat M. et al. Full mouth implant rehabilitation of a patient with ectodermal dysplasia after orthognathic surgery, sinus and ridge augmentation: a clinical report //The journal of advanced prosthodontics. – 2011. – Т. 3. – №. 2. – С. 96-100.

2

Dalkiz M., Gul D., Dalkiz A. S. Prosthetic rehabilitation and cephalometric evaluation of Gapo syndrome: 29 years follow up //EC Dent Sci. – 2019. – Т. 18. – С. 252-269.

3

Feier R., Pacurar M., Cocos D. I. materials used in fracture rehabilitation" e fort I, II and III //Medicine and materials. – 2024. – Т. 4. – №. 1. – С. 33-42.

4

Hatay B. S. et al. Orthodontic-Orthognatic Surgical Approach In Adult Skeletal Class III Case //International Dental Journal. – 2024. – Т. 74. – С. S345.

5

Kessler P., Lie S. A. N. Indications for Mandibular Advancement //Illustrated Manual of Orthognathic Surgery: Osteotomies of the Mandible. – Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2024. – С. 195-200.

6

Kovach I. V., Alekseenko N. V., Bindiugin O. J. Clinic, diagnosis, treatment, prevention, prosthetics various dentofacial anomalies and deformities. – DMA, 2018.

7

Ohba S. et al. Assessment of skeletal stability of intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy with one-day maxillary–mandibular fixation followed by early jaw exercise //Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery. – 2013. – Т. 41. – №. 7. – С. 586-592.

8

SHOKIROV S. T., MUKIMOV I. I., SHAROPOV S. G. Characteristics of Anthropometric Indicators of the Face in Patients with Congenital Cliffs of the Upper LIP and Palate after the Main Stages of the Operation //Central Asian Journal of Medical and Natural Science. – 2023. – Т. 4. – №. 1. – С. 38-42.

9

Spalj S. et al. Skeletal components of class III malocclusions and compensation mechanisms //Journal of oral rehabilitation. – 2008. – Т. 35. – №. 8. – С. 629-637.

10

Suba Z. et al. Cleidocranial dysplasia: diagnostic criteria and combined treatment //Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. – 2005. – Т. 16. – №. 6. – С. 1122-1126